On November 20, 2025, President Trump signed EOModifying the Scope of Tariffs on the Government of Brazilreminding us in Section 1 thatEO 14323 Addressing Threats to The United States by the Government of Brazil signed July 30, 2025 (discussed in my July 31, 2025 ANP Article) President Trump declared Brazil a national security threat due to the policies, practices, and actions of Brazil's government generating a tariff rate of 40%. On October 6, 2025, President Trump participated in a phone call with Brazil's current President beginning the negotiation process to reduce/remove tariffs on Brazil based on the findings leading to EO 14323. Based on the negotiations, and the changes in policies, practices, and actions of the Brazilian government and upon the needs of the Citizens of the US, the tariff schedule shall be adjusted appropriately.
Section 2 Tariff Modifications to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule as provided in Annex II of this EO, effective November 13, 2025 (which also happens to be the date joint statements on reciprocal trade agreements with Western Hemisphere Trading Partners was announced and discussed in my November 14, 2025 ANP Article).
Section 3 Implementation orders the Secretary of State to continue monitoring circumstances precipitating EO 14323. Should action need to be taken the Secretary of State is to immediately inform the President of the changes. Furthermore, the Secretary of State shall consult with the Secretary of Commerce, Secretary of Homeland Security, the United States Trade Representative, the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, the Assistant to the President for Economic Policy, the Senior Counselor for Trade and Manufacturing, and the Chair of the US International Trade Commission to implement this EO.
Section 4 Severability states that even if any provision of this EO is determined to be invalid for whatever reason only that portion of the EO will be affected, the remainder of the EO shall remain in force.
17 SCOTUS stays or motions to vacate of lower court orders
1 SCOTUS affirmation of lower court order
7 suits where judges ruled for the federal government
9 suits where judges ruled against the federal government
6 criminal prosecutions by the DOJ:
Representative McIver,
former FBI Director James Comey,
former National Security Advisor John Bolton,
(illegal alien) Kilmar Abrego Garcia,
New York AG Letitia A James
Congressional candidate Katherine Abughazaleh
In the lawsuitState of Oregon, et al. v. Trump, et al. docket # 25-7194 Appeal of 3:25-cv-01756 (discussed in my October 1, 2025 ANP Article) filed in 9th Circuit Court of Appeals on November 14, 2025 (discussed in my October 9, 2025, October 21, 2025, November 13, 2025, and November 19, 2025 ANP Articles) appealing Judge Immergut's order permanently enjoining the deployment of federalized NG to Portland. On November 19, 2025 appeals 25-6268 and 25-7194 were combined. A partial administrative stay was granted. The November 7, 2025 injunction is temporarily stayed to maintain the current status quo while the original case proceeds through the court system. Once SCOTUS rules, an expedited briefing will be scheduled.
Declare that Defendants terminations of TPS for Syria was unlawful under the APA and unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment;
Declare that the decision to provide only 60 days notice before the terminations of TPS for Syria take effect was unlawful under the APA;
Set aside or otherwise vacate the termination of TPS for Syria as beyond Defendants authority and/or unlawful under the APA;
Postpone or stay the termination of TPS for Syria from taking effect or being put into effect;
Enjoin and restrain all Defendants, and their officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all other persons who are in active concert or participation with any of them, from enforcing the termination of TPS for Syria;
Order Defendants to take all steps necessary to ensure that the TPS designation for Syria remains in full force and effect;
Award Plaintiffs attorneys fees and costs under 28 U.S.C. 2412 and any other applicable statute or regulation; and
Award such other and further relief that the Court may deem just, equitable, and proper.
On November 19, 2025,Judge Katherine Polk Failla granted plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction in part. Removal of TPS for Syrians is postponed pending further order from the court pursuant to 5 USC705. Plaintiff's motion to compel production of the Certified Administrative Record is denied without prejudice.
For the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction and a section 705 stay, ECF 3, is GRANTED. Defendants motion to dismiss, ECF 35, is DENIED in part and DEFERRED in part.
It is hereby ORDERED that the DOD Defendants are ENJOINED from deploying or requesting the deployment of any members of the National Guard in the District of Columbia pursuant to the following:
Letter from Secretary of the Army Daniel Driscoll to Brigadier General Leland Blanchard, Commanding General, District of Columbia National Guard (DCNG) (Aug. 11, 2025);
DCNG Permanent Order 25-223;
Memorandum for Interim Commanding General, DCNG, Re: Extension of 11 August 2025, Mobilization of D.C. National Guard JTF-DC (Sept. 3, 2025);
Any guidance, regulations, or orders that effectuate the extension of the DCNGs deployment through February 28, 2026;
Any Memorandum of Understanding executed between the DCNG and another state in support of Operation Make DC Safe and Beautiful;
Any extensions, modifications, or other actions implementing these orders, regulations, or memoranda; and it is further
ORDERED that these orders, regulations, and memoranda are STAYED pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 705; and it is further
ORDERED that this Order shall apply to the maximum extent provided for by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2) and 5 U.S.C. 705 and 706.
Defendants motion for relief from Local Civil Rule 7(n)(1)s requirement to file a certified list of the contents of the administrative record, ECF 35-1 at 26 n.10, is GRANTED.
Defendants request to administratively stay preliminary relief, ECF 35-1 at 53, is GRANTED. This Order is STAYED for 21 days until December 11, 2025. [To give time for the appeal she knows will be filed.]
Those are some of the exact words used by Googles censors, aka 'Orwelliancontent police,' in describing many of our controversial stories.Stories later proven to be truthful and light years ahead of the mainstream media. But because we reported those 'inconvenient truths' they're trying to bankrupt ANP.
